CHSU Discovery

Six practical tips to prepare for the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) USA level 1

International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Peer reviewed publication
May 2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2023.100666
ISSN: 1746-0689 LN: Graneto LN: Van Es LN: Kadavakollu LN: LN: Mavyan LN: Qureshi LN: Merino

Repository

Description

Abstract

Sophisticated high-stakes licensure and specialty certification maintenance examinations are educational requirements in osteopathic medicine. Passing the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) USA Level 1 is one of the crucial milestones that osteopathic medical students (DO students) must achieve while starting clinical rotations and before applying to residency programs. While standardized examinations are often used for gatekeeping purposes, the broader goal of COMLEX USA Level 1 is to assess competent osteopathic physicians. This manuscript aims to assist DO students as well as osteopathic medical educators, learning specialists, medical advisors, and administrators in preparing a successful plan for the COMLEX USA Level 1. The tips within this manuscript align with the information taught in osteopathic medical school curricula, including osteopathic principles and practice (OPP), osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) and the content outline found within the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) blueprint. The planning tip system is (1) Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) curriculum focus; (2) OPP/OMT content study; (3) Practice using clinical scenarios; (4) Review the NBOME blueprint; (5) Effective practice using question banks; and (6) Practice using full-length exams. Issues related to allocating DO students' time in preparation for the exam while providing useful resources to learn planning strategies and practice with board-style questions are discussed. Using the DO PREP tip system in this manuscript, DO students can develop more effective board preparation strategies to improve their success on COMLEX USA Level 1. This opinion-based article describes some but not all tips for osteopathic medical students to plan their COMLEX USA Level 1 board preparation.

Keywords

  • Comprehensive osteopathic medical licensing examination
  • Board Preparation
  • COMLEX Level 1 preparation
  • Planning/reviewing/practicing tips
  • Licensure examinations
  • Osteopathic medical education and assessment
Show Full Abstract Collapse Abstract

Affiliations

  1. California Health Sciences University College of Osteopathic Medicine

Publisher

Elsevier

Languages

English

Citations

  • Competency-based reforms of the undergraduate biology curriculum: Integrating the physical and biological sciences. CBE-Life Sci Educ (2013). , 12, 162. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0143
  • Predicting osteopathic medical students' performance on the United States medical licensing examination from results of the comprehensive osteopathic medical licensing examination. Cureus (2021). , 13.
  • National board of osteopathic medical Examiners in the 21st century. J Osteopath Med (2000). , 100, 703.
  • Anticipating the impact of the USMLE step 1 Pass/fail scoring decision on underrepresented-in-medicine students. Acad Med (2020). , 95, 1318. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003490
  • The cost of board examination and preparation: An overlooked factor in medical student debt. Cureus (2019). , 11, e4168.
  • Preparation for the United States medical licensing examinations in the face of COVID-19. Med Sci Educ (2020). , 30, 1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01011-1
  • A retrospective and correlative analysis of academic and nonacademic predictors of COMLEX level 1 performance. J Osteopath Med (2022). , 122, 187. https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2021-0175
  • Student well-being during dedicated preparation for USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 exams. BMC Med Educ (2022). , 22, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03055-2
  • Early prediction of the risk of scoring lower than 500 on the COMLEX 1. BMC Med Educ (2021). , 21, 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02501-5
  • Minimal impact of organic chemistry prerequisite on student performance in introductory biochemistry. CBE-Life Sci Educ (2009). , 8, 44. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-10-0093
  • Predictive relationship of osteopathic manual medicine grades and COMLEX-USA Level 1 total scores and osteopathic principles and practice subscores. J Am Osteopath Assoc (2014). , 114, 480.
  • Comparison of basic science knowledge between DO and MD students. J Am Osteopath Assoc (2017). , 117, 114.
  • Association between undergraduate performance predictors and academic and clinical performance of osteopathic medical students. J Am Osteopath Assoc (2018). , 118, 106.
  • Relationship between academic achievement and COMLEX-USA Level 1 performance: A multisite study. J Osteopath Med (2000). , 100, 238.
  • Twelve tips on guiding preparation for both high-stakes exams and long-term learning. Med Teach (2021). , 43, 518. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1828570
  • Preparing to take the USMLE Step 1: A survey on medical students' self-reported study habits. Postgrad Med (2015). , 91, 257. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133081
  • A preliminary analysis of different approaches to preparing for the USMLE step 1. Acad Med (2000). , 75, S40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200010001-00013
  • How to prepare for the medical college admissions test (MCAT): Six important tips for pre-medical students from rural areas. Med Sci Educ (2019). , 29, 1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00823-0
  • Training future family physicians to become master adaptive learners. Fam Med (2021). , 53, 559.
  • Exploring preparation for the USMLE step 2 exams to inform best practices. PRiMER (2021). , 5, 26. https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2021.693105
  • Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: Problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum. Med Educ (2008). , 35, 1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2001.01058.x
  • Peer tutoring in a medical school: Perceptions of tutors and tutees. BMC Med Educ (2016). , 16, 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0589-1
  • A qualitative study on self-regulated learning among high performing medical students. BMC Med Educ (2021). , 21, 320. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02712-w
  • Twelve tips for teaching with concept maps in medical education. Med Teach (2013). , 35, 201. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.759644
  • Identifying long- and short-term processes in perceptual learning. Psychol Sci (2022). , 33, 830. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211056620
  • Adaptive progressive continual learning. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell (2022). , 44, 6715. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095064
  • Are study strategies related to medical licensing exam performance?. Int J Med Educ (2014). , 5, 199. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5439.6491
  • Evidence-based redesign of the COMLEX-USA series. J Am Osteopath Assoc (2017). , 117, 253. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2017.043
  • Meaningful use of COMSAE phase 1 in preparation for COMLEX-USA level 1. J Osteopath Med (2021). , 121, 611. https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2020-0190
  • (2015). .
  • COMSAE Phase 1: Value added. J Osteopath Med (2021). , 121, 717. https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2021-0143
  • First Aid for the COMLEX: An osteopathic manipulative medicine review. J Osteopath Med (2009). , 109, 629.
  • Resources that improve medical board licensing examination performance. Cureus (2019). , 11.
  • Factors leading to successful performance on U.S. national licensure exams for medical students: A scoping review. Acad Med (2023). , 98, 136. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004877
  • (2018). .
  • (2011). .
  • (2009). .
  • (2007). .
  • (n.d.). .
  • Frequency of student resource use and academic performance in preclerkship education: A survey study. Med Sci Educ (2022). . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01674-y
  • Guessing in multiple choice questions. Med Educ (1976). , 10, 530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1976.tb00488.x
  • A five-Part Seminar series on USMLE step 1 preparation. MedEdPORTAL (2010). . https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.7788
  • Should students change their answers on multiple choice questions?. Adv Physiol Educ (2021). , 45, 182. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00090.2020
  • Enhancing COMLEX-USA: Evidence-based redesign of the osteopathic medical licensure examination program. J Med Regul (2018). , 104, 11. https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-104.3.11
  • Examining bloom's taxonomy in multiple choice questions: Students' approach to questions. Med Sci Educ (2021). , 31, 1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01305-y
  • Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress. Science (2016). , 354, 1046. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5067
  • Nourish: A pilot program to support self-Efficacy, learning, and wellness during USMLE step 1 preparation. Med Educ Online (2023). , 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2153781
  • Identifying and supporting students to prevent USMLE step 1 failures when testing follows clerkships: Insights from 9 schools. Acad Med (2020). , 95, 1338. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003272
  • Relationships between the comprehensive osteopathic medical achievement test (COMAT) subject examinations and the COMLEX-USA level 2-cognitive evaluation. J Am Osteopath Assoc (2014). , 114, 714.
  • Innovation in learning: Critical review of the literature is absolutely necessary for the modern medical student. Cureus (2023). , 15.
  • One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”. PLoS One (2023). , 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279911
  • Predictors of scoring at least 600 on COMLEX-USA Level 1: Successful preparation strategies. J Am Osteopath Assoc (2013). , 113, 164.
Show all 52 citations
Loading...